My Term Papers

If you order your cheap custom paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on english immersion. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality english immersion paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in english immersion, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your english immersion paper at affordable prices with cheap custom writing service!

High Schools do not accept the Law of English Immersion

I came to the United States for two reasons, excel my skills and learn a new language to succeed in life. I came to finish my last year of high school, in a school close to my house in the south west of Phoenix. Being a monolingual Spanish-speaking was very difficult to overcome each obstacle. I knew that one the worst of my problems would be this new language, English. For my surprise in this high school instead of teaching me in English, instructors were teaching their classes in Spanish. This experience disappointed me, because I was expecting a high school where all the instructors and students as well speak English only.

I told my parents about this atrocious experience, and we decided go talk to my counselor. We asked him to put me in regular classes, where I can get acquainted with native English speakers. To our surprise he refused to accept our request. He told us that those were not the rules in this high school; that a foreign student not speaking of English must pass for a process of bilingual classes before they can take regular classes. As a consequence, I decided to move to another high school in Peoria. This high school was completely different than the one that I went before. There were not Spanish classes, not bilingual instructors, and not even Hispanic students. I was the only Hispanic going to this high school, and to tell you the truth that scared me. Well, as time went by the school year ended and my English actually had improved. I could not believe that now I can read, speak, listening and even write in English and the most impressive thing is that all happened in only one year. The English Immersion Program which I was exposed helped me as an initial technique of teaching English for students that need English language assistance. English immersion programs normally do not exceed a year, and it is designed to give English learners a working command of the English language as quickly as possible. One day I went back to my old high school to see some of my old friends. When I asked them "How is your English going?" They did not answer; for my surprise they were still struggling with the language. They were still taking bilingual classes without any improvement in the language, but the worst thing was that they had lose their hope, their desire and their dream to become successful in this life and of achieve the American Dream .

Order College Papers on english immersion

I am frustrated that a school district is openly violating the law by continuing with bilingual education. I think that maybe that answer of why they still teaching bilingual classes is that many bilingual-education proponents in the United States have a racist view of Latin American immigrants. Perhaps for them Hispanics are not smart enough to learn English. I think that the government should oblige, in every school in the United States, to replace all bilingual classes by English immersion and also it should get rid of waivers for bilingual classes.

Enforcing bilingual classes only creates a bigger disadvantage for struggling Latinos. In this egotistical world most people have no sympathy for those who can not speak English. If these students were to move to a different state, not knowing English would make it impossible for their families to survive. As a Hispanic, I fully understand that these families came from a country other than United States and that they want to maintain their tradition, but if they choose to live in a country other than there own, they must adapt. I give a standing ovation to families and teacher that want to keep remembering their native culture to their children, but wake up and remember where you live now.

According to statistics published in the Arizona Republic a couple of week a ago, today nearly a hundred thousand children in Arizona public schools do not know English, and less than five percent of these students successfully learn English most years. Ninety-five percent of the Arizona students who start a school year classified as no knowing English end that same school year still classified as not having learned English. Many of these children eventually leave school not able to read English, write English, or sometimes even speak English properly. Any educational system with an annual failure rate of ninety-five percent must be ended. That is why I encourage the school district to get rid of the bilingual classes and accept the English immersion.

About the only people who support bilingual education are the people who make money from this failed government program the bilingual teachers, the bilingual administrators, the bilingual professors, and the politicians they control. The bilingual education industry will say or do anything to avoid the Law of English immersion. The bilingual education industry makes extra money for every child who does not know English, so they sometimes even force young Hispanic children who already know English into their program against their parents wishes. Bilingual education means isolation and racial discrimination against Hispanic children, and must be ended.

The English language is the national public language of the United States of America and of the state of Arizona. It is spoken by the vast majority of Arizona residents, and is also the leading world language for science, technology, and international business, thereby being the language of economic opportunity. Immigrant parents are eager to have their children acquire a good knowledge of English, thereby allowing them to fully participate in the American Dream of economic and social advancement. The government and the public schools of Arizona have a moral obligation and a constitutional duty to provide all of Arizona's children, regardless of their ethnicity or national origins, with the skills necessary to become productive members of our society. Of these skills, being deft in the English language is among the most important. The public schools of Arizona currently do an inadequate job of educating immigrant children, wasting financial resources on costly experimental language programs whose failure over the past two decades is demonstrated by the current high drop-out rates of many immigrant children. Young immigrant children can easily acquire full fluency in a new language, such as English, if they are heavily exposed to that language in the classroom at an early age. Therefore, it is resolved that all children in Arizona public schools shall be taught English as rapidly and effectively as possible.

Bilingual education has failed in its mission to teach children English. By doing so, it has denied thousands of young Americans the opportunity to fully realize the American dream. Students are trapped for years in segregated bilingual classrooms that fail to teach them English. In Arizona, the annual failure rate for these programs approaches 5 percent. According to statistics, in certain districts, some students remain in bilingual education programs for ten years or more.

Despite its name, bilingual education is anything but bilingual. Most so-called bilingual programs exist only for native-Spanish speakers and are often taught exclusively or predominantly in Spanish. If bilingual education is so great why isnt it used for native speakers of the approximately 40 other languages spoken in Arizonas public schools?

Students in bilingual programs not only fail to learn English; they also receive a substandard education in core subjects. Not surprisingly, students in bilingual programs have some of the lowest test scores and highest drop out rates in the country. Even worse, their incapability to speak English considerably limits their future earning potential and opportunities. Basically, the best way to learn English is to be taught in English. It is time to rescue non-English speaking students from the academic Siberia of bilingual education and provide them with the tools they need to fully realize the American Dream.

A couple days ago I interviewed two of my sister's friends at their Marivale High School, in the south side of Phoenix. I asked them "What do you think about the way your instructors teach their classes? Are these classes harder than the classes you used to take in Mexico?" They laughed and suddenly replied "Our classes are very easy. Our instructors are Hispanics so they speak Spanish in the classroom all the time, so the language is not a problem". One of them also added "I do not, personally, miss Mexico because here I find everything pretty similar to Mexico, I speak Spanish at the school, at home and even at my work, so I do not think that I will need to learn the language any time soon".

I think that the classes here in the United States should be way harder than in Mexico or any other country. As I could confirm many students do not know the importance of learn the language, and even worst their teacher are doing nada to help their students. This is happening everywhere, not only in the south side of Phoenix. Hispanics are being segregated by Hispanics. Instead of helping our community, some people are harming people that their only desire is to succeed in life.

If we take a look to the dropout rate in high school, they are not dropping out because they are not intelligent. They are dropping out because they can not speak English. Kids in bilingual classes are learning nada. Kids are not gaining the language until they gain it orally. I urge the school district to apply English immersion in all the schools of Arizona.

In conclusion, parents should take more responsibility for the education of their children. They should ask for English immersion programs in their children's schools. This is the only way to weigh the school district conscience to really provide a good education for the children. I learned English in one year using English immersion. If English immersion really works, why do not try in all the school without exceptions. If the instructors really care about their children, they should teach their pupils English with English. Adopt English to adapt. Real learning means to learn English; if the faster way to learn English if for immersion we must try it.

Please note that this sample paper on english immersion is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on english immersion, we are here to assist you. Your cheap college papers on english immersion will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from cheap custom writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Emily Dickinson's background and its significance. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Emily Dickinson's background and its significance paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Emily Dickinson's background and its significance, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Emily Dickinson's background and its significance paper at affordable prices!

Emily Elizabeth Dickinson, an American poet who is often described misleadingly as a virgin recluse and a partially cracked poetess (her own phrase) is now widely regarded as on of Americas 1th century genius of letters (Morehouse 618). Dickinson was born on December 10, 180 in Amherst Massachusetts to Edward Dickinson (a prominent lawyer, and later Congressman) and Emily Norcross Dickinson, and died May 15, 1886 in Amherst also. Her death certificate indicates that her occupation at home (Eberwein 56), an ambiguous title. Dickinson led a reclusive lifestyle, living most of her life on the Dickinson Homestead. Despite this, her poetry brilliantly reflects an inner creative inspiration. This is demonstrated when, in a conversation to her mentor Thomas Wentworth Higginson in 1870, she says I find ecstasy in livingñthe mere sense of living is joy enough (Kennedy and Goia 6).

Dickinson grew up in a New England environment, which emphasized the close bonds between religious devotion, intellectual activity, and citizenship (Eberwein 564). Her education took place between the balance between Amhersts intellectual growth and the tradition of maintaining submissive behavior. Dickinson handled this balance quite beautifully. She began her education at Amhersts primary school, and then attended Amherst Academy from 1840-1847 along with her sister Lavina. During her time at Amherst Academy, Dickinson was greatly influenced by the scientist-theologian Edward HitchcockÖand worshiped at the First Church during the period of revivalistic evangelical Protestantism known as the Second Awakening (Eberwein 564). It was Amherst Academy that effectively excited and activated her intellectual capabilities. She was known as a wit; she wrote comic sermons parodying the rhetoric of the local clergy (Morehouse 6). Dickinson spent her schooldays studying and socializing with the young and sharp men and women of the Academy.

From 1847-1848, Dickinson attended Mount Holyoke Female Seminary, which she left after only three terms to return home to Amherst and her family due to a persistent illness and also homesickness. In addition, it has been suggested that Dickinsons formal education had already taken place at the Academy, and that she actually preferred her own home library to the one at Seminary school (Morehouse 6). Milton and Shakespeare were among her favorites, but she also delighted in the works of female writers such as Elizabeth Barrett Browning and the Brontes. Dickinson read and considered both what was new and what was classic (Morehouse 6). Ironically, she had to smuggle in poetry, the very genre of work that she is famous for, because it was perceived by her father to be works of pure imagination and hence frivolous and indulgent to read (Morehouse 6). Although she professed to fear her father, Dickinson fortunately seemed to have a sense of humor concerning the peculiarities of all members of her family (Morehouse 61).

| Top | After she returned from Mount Holyoke Female Seminary, Dickinson rarely left Amherst again, taking only a few trips to Boston for medical reasons, Philadelphia, and Washington D.C. As the years passed, she became more and more reclusive, spending a large amount of time in her roomóoften writing poetry. What survives from these circumstances is the intensely passionate poetry written from these private circumstances (Kennedy and Goia 6). Dickinson increasingly narrowed her circle to her family and a few close friends, notably Susan Gilbert (Eberwein 564), who married her brother, Austin Dickinson, in 1856. The couple moved in next door to the Dickinson Homestead, allowing Emily to frequently walk to visit Susan, whom she developed a deep friendship with.

We are only the poets, and everyone else is prose. (Morehouse 6) wrote Dickinson to Susan in the early 1850s. This letter marked a beginning of a deep friendship that was both literary and loving. The two women remained in contact for the next thirty years, despite stories of Dickinsons complete seclusion from the world. Susan married Dickinsons brother, Austin, in 1856, and the couple moved in next door to the Dickinson Homestead, and allowing Emily to frequently walk to visit Susan and her brother.

During the 1850s, Amherst was a center for the evangelical ardor that swept the northeast during the middle of the century (6). Emily Dickinson ceased going to church during this time, while her close girlhood friends were accepted into the church. In a poem, Dickinson wrote Some Keep the Sabbath Going to Church--/ I keep it staying at Homeó (Kennedy and Goia 67). This reflects the fact that she was pursuing an independent spiritual journey, despite social pressures.

Much speculation surrounds the crises that drove her to poetic expression and her reclusive behaviors. From 1858-1861 Dickinson composed three passionate romantic Master letters to an unknown male audience. The identity of this lover remains under speculation. Some suggest Charles Wadsworth or Samuel Bowles, both married men who she presumably had romantic attachments to. Other candidates include Susan and her friend Kate Scott Anthon Turner (Eberwein 565). It is during this time that Dickinson Begins to claim her poetic identity; writing is her sole province (Morehouse 6).

Instead of completing the domestic chores that were expected of her in the Puritan ideas of self-sacrifice, Dickinson formed her own version of domesticity and sewed her own manuscripts into books that had to wait until the world was ready for them (Morehouse 6). These booklets, known now as fascicles, contained poems which remarkable for their distilled wit, ambiguous manner, and stylistic idiosyncrasies (Eberwein 564). The poems were shared with close friends and family, but not offered for publication until after her death. In fact, very few of her poems were published during her lifetime, reports vary between just two (The International Dictionary of Womens Biography 144), seven (Kennedy and Goia 6), and ten (Eberwein 564), although she composed 1775 known poems (Kennedy and Goia 6). It is evident through her poetry, as well as her actions, that Dickinson valued her privacy and did not necessarily desire to risk the fate of literary celebrity.

| Top | In 186, Emily Dickinson began her correspondence with Thomas Wentworth Higginson, a magazine editor. Can you tell me if my verse is alive? she asked and sent him two poems, then thanked him for the surgery when hed replied with suggestions (Morehouse 64). In their lengthy correspondence, she signed herself his scholar. She complained to him in 1866 when A Narrow Fellow in the Grass was published (perhaps because Susan submitted it) saying it was robbed of meÖand defeated of the third lineÖI told you I did not print. This was not a poet without an audience; this was a poet who insisted upon the fluidity of a text. (Morehouse 64).

Dickinsons life, though private from the 1860s on, was not free of turmoil. Her eyesight bothered her, and some have speculated that she suffered from exotropia, a misalignment of the pupils which could have made her extremely sensitive to light (Morehouse 64). This could have at least partially accounted for her reclusive lifestyle. Dickinson took great pleasure in gardening, reading, friendships and nurturing Austin and Sues three children (Eberwein 565). She also took care of her invalid mother with Lavina. It seems as though Dickinson was constantly confronted with grief, as many of her family members and loved ones passed away. In her early poems, she coped width religious doubt. Her later writings, especially her letters, suggest an increasingly hopeful sense of her relationship with God (Eberwein 565). She remained fierce, witty, and physical, a poet who described her position as a woman and poet in terms of paradox and extremes My life had stood--/ a Loaded Gun(Morehouse 64). Emily Dickinson died, possibly of kidney failure, on May 15, 1886 at the age of 55 years. Interestingly, her coffin was not carried through the streets of the town which she inhabited her entire life, but through the fields, sweet with clover and wild flowers she had loved (Morehouse 64-65). Upstairs in her home, her poetry awaited the world.

Following her death, her sister Lavina came upon a box of fascicles and other manuscripts and decided to display Emily Dickinsons genius to the world. Higginson assisted with the publication and promotion, and in 180 Poems by Emily Dickinson was published. From 180 until the mid-twentieth century, nine posthumous collections of her poems were published by friends and relatives (Kennedy and Goia 6). If the reclusive and antisocial Emily Dickinson had been known only public achievements, she would have soon been forgotten (Eberwein 565).

Dickinsons style of poetry is definitely uniqueóirregular, condensed, emotionalóbrimming with intellectual energy and ironic wit. Her imagery ranges from domestic metaphors, through scientific and geographical references, to literary allusions (Eberwein 564). Although they suggested unrequited love and religious searching, Dickinsons lyrics are vague on circumstances and surrounding the feelings of longing, passions, and despair. In a quiet subversion to gender assumptions, Dickinsons poetry has been steadily gaining recognition as works of art. She has become the most widely recognized woman poet to write in the English language and as an inspiration, to modern women writers. Within the context of New Englands Protestant and Transcendental cultures, Emily Dickinson has crafted a voice of fruitful tension and spiritual anxieties unleashed by the Civil War (Eberwein 566). It is evident that attempts to categorize her would deny the language that she lived moving, various and variant, something alive, still living (Morehouse 61). Perhaps she described poetry in all its glory when, in 1870, she told Thomas Wentworth Higginson If I read a book [and] it makes my whole body so cold no fire ever can warm me I know that is poetry. If I feel physically as though the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry (Kennedy and Goia 68).

Please note that this sample paper on Emily Dickinson's background and its significance is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Emily Dickinson's background and its significance, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Emily Dickinson's background and its significance will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on A Rose For Emily. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality A Rose For Emily paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in A Rose For Emily, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your A Rose For Emily paper at affordable prices!

Ellis 1

Ryan Ellis

Mrs. Shaw

Eng 11

Order custom research paper on A Rose For Emily

18 November 0

Who's In Charge

The setting in both "A Rose for Emily" and "The Yellow Wall-Paper" show us the role

that women played in society. When comparing these two stories it is obvious to see that both

settings are very similar in many ways. The women in both of these stories play an inferior role to

a male. For example in "A Rose for Emily" Emily's father seems to make all of her decisions for

her. He does this by rejecting all of her possible mates that are presented to her. He thinks that

Emily is to good for any of the men. By doing this he is giving Emily no chance to start a family

of her own in the future making Emily depressed and for the most part insane.

As for " The Yellow Wall-Paper" there is a similar situation. The narrator's husband

makes her stay in a confined room with nothing to do but sleep. He takes away any type of

stimulation or any kind of activities leaving her with nothing to do but sleep. In his opinion the

only way to cure the narrators temporary nervous depression was to make her sleep. The narrator

had no say so as to what she thought would help her problem. She was ordered by her husband

and she did it. [As the same for Emily and her father.]When Emily's father refused all of her

possible mates, she had no say so in the matter as well. Her father didn't care to see how Emily

felt about any of her mates. Both of the male figures made decisions for these women without

hearing what they had to think or say about their situations.

Throughout both of these stories the women are oppressed by a male figure and in both

these stories the women end up becoming insane. The situations that the women are put through

make both the women that much worse. In "the wall-paper" the narrator says that " all she needs

is congenial work with excitement and change."(Gilman 10) Instead her husband wanted her to

Ellis

do the total opposite and have no excitement and no change. This drives the narrator to resent her

husband every time he opens his mouth. She could not stand to be in that same dull room with the

same dull wallpaper anymore.

The setting is a major factor for the women's insanity. In "a rose" Emily's father dies

leaving her no clue as to what to do. She has never had the chance to experience a life on her own.

She has always had her dad to tell her what to do and when to do it. Now that he's gone she has

no life. She is not a social person. The only person she really ever talked to her was her father.

Eventually she becomes a recluse and very rarely would ever leave the house. By this time the

whole town has noticed that Emily was secluding herself from the world. They see her as an

unapproachable person because they know that she has gone crazy. Well, Emily finally has a

chance at a relationship with a man by the name of Homer Barron. Soon she finds out that Homer

is not a marrying man. Now knowing that this is probably her last chance to start a relationship

and a family of her own she can't take it. This is the last straw that sends her over the top.

Wanting to keep her one true love she orders arsenic poison. She engraves Homers initials into a

toiletry set, buys an outfit and a night shirt for him. She eventually kills Homer by giving him the

poison. Just the thought of losing something that her father had kept from her all her life was too

much to bear. Forty years later when the townspeople finally get the courage to enter the house

they find a bridal tomb; a tarnished toiletry set, a neatly pressed suit, and a rotting Homer Barron

wearing the the night shirt with a "profound and fleshless grin (Gilman 5). Her father and the

townspeople see her as an untouchable idol bring about this situation; the loneliness that they force

on her is maddening.

In "the wallpaper" it should come as no surprise that the narrator in this story becomes

crazed after months of lying in bed with no company other than her overprotective husband and

his extremely annoying sister. Just as Emily takes Homer's life because of the resentment towards

her father, the narrator in Gilmans story destroys the wallpaper in resentment to her husbands

Ellis

captivity. The wallpaper confines her,it irritates her, and makes her insane. Referring to the

wallpaper as her husband. In "the wallpaper" the main image of the setting symbolizes the

narrators role in society, and the woman trapped behind the wallpaper is symbolic of herself. For

instance, when she says " I've pulled off most of the paper,so you can't put me back" (Gilman

115). The narrator is trying to break free from her husbands demands and rule over her. So by

tearing the wallpaper down represents her breaking away from her husbands commands.

In both of these stories the women are subject to the decisions made by a male figure. In

my opinion the outcome of both of these stories is the same . By the end of both stories the

women had become insane due to a male figure. The setting in both of these stories fit them well

and at the end had something to do with the downfall of the women. In my opinion these two

stories were written to expose the cruelty inflicted upon women by society.Ellis 1

Ryan Ellis

Mrs. Shaw

Eng 11

18 November 0

Who's In Charge

The setting in both "A Rose for Emily" and "The Yellow Wall-Paper" show us the role

that women played in society. When comparing these two stories it is obvious to see that both

settings are very similar in many ways. The women in both of these stories play an inferior role to

a male. For example in "A Rose for Emily" Emily's father seems to make all of her decisions for

her. He does this by rejecting all of her possible mates that are presented to her. He thinks that

Emily is to good for any of the men. By doing this he is giving Emily no chance to start a family

of her own in the future making Emily depressed and for the most part insane.

As for " The Yellow Wall-Paper" there is a similar situation. The narrator's husband

makes her stay in a confined room with nothing to do but sleep. He takes away any type of

stimulation or any kind of activities leaving her with nothing to do but sleep. In his opinion the

only way to cure the narrators temporary nervous depression was to make her sleep. The narrator

had no say so as to what she thought would help her problem. She was ordered by her husband

and she did it. [As the same for Emily and her father.]When Emily's father refused all of her

possible mates, she had no say so in the matter as well. Her father didn't care to see how Emily

felt about any of her mates. Both of the male figures made decisions for these women without

hearing what they had to think or say about their situations.

Throughout both of these stories the women are oppressed by a male figure and in both

these stories the women end up becoming insane. The situations that the women are put through

make both the women that much worse. In "the wall-paper" the narrator says that " all she needs

is congenial work with excitement and change."(Gilman 10) Instead her husband wanted her to

Ellis

do the total opposite and have no excitement and no change. This drives the narrator to resent her

husband every time he opens his mouth. She could not stand to be in that same dull room with the

same dull wallpaper anymore.

The setting is a major factor for the women's insanity. In "a rose" Emily's father dies

leaving her no clue as to what to do. She has never had the chance to experience a life on her own.

She has always had her dad to tell her what to do and when to do it. Now that he's gone she has

no life. She is not a social person. The only person she really ever talked to her was her father.

Eventually she becomes a recluse and very rarely would ever leave the house. By this time the

whole town has noticed that Emily was secluding herself from the world. They see her as an

unapproachable person because they know that she has gone crazy. Well, Emily finally has a

chance at a relationship with a man by the name of Homer Barron. Soon she finds out that Homer

is not a marrying man. Now knowing that this is probably her last chance to start a relationship

and a family of her own she can't take it. This is the last straw that sends her over the top.

Wanting to keep her one true love she orders arsenic poison. She engraves Homers initials into a

toiletry set, buys an outfit and a night shirt for him. She eventually kills Homer by giving him the

poison. Just the thought of losing something that her father had kept from her all her life was too

much to bear. Forty years later when the townspeople finally get the courage to enter the house

they find a bridal tomb; a tarnished toiletry set, a neatly pressed suit, and a rotting Homer Barron

wearing the the night shirt with a "profound and fleshless grin (Gilman 5). Her father and the

townspeople see her as an untouchable idol bring about this situation; the loneliness that they force

on her is maddening.

In "the wallpaper" it should come as no surprise that the narrator in this story becomes

crazed after months of lying in bed with no company other than her overprotective husband and

his extremely annoying sister. Just as Emily takes Homer's life because of the resentment towards

her father, the narrator in Gilmans story destroys the wallpaper in resentment to her husbands

Ellis

captivity. The wallpaper confines her,it irritates her, and makes her insane. Referring to the

wallpaper as her husband. In "the wallpaper" the main image of the setting symbolizes the

narrators role in society, and the woman trapped behind the wallpaper is symbolic of herself. For

instance, when she says " I've pulled off most of the paper,so you can't put me back" (Gilman

115). The narrator is trying to break free from her husbands demands and rule over her. So by

tearing the wallpaper down represents her breaking away from her husbands commands.

In both of these stories the women are subject to the decisions made by a male figure. In

my opinion the outcome of both of these stories is the same . By the end of both stories the

women had become insane due to a male figure. The setting in both of these stories fit them well

and at the end had something to do with the downfall of the women. In my opinion these two

stories were written to expose the cruelty inflicted upon women by society.

Please note that this sample paper on A Rose For Emily is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on A Rose For Emily, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on A Rose For Emily will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on brocade's financials. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality brocade's financials paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in brocade's financials, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your brocade's financials paper at affordable prices!

Financial Project Brocade

According to an article about the Storage Area Networking industry posted on financial information provider, fool.com, the total size of the SAN market is expected to reach $4.6 billion in 006. This is a dramatic increase in market size from a reported size of $1. billion in 00. This increase will no doubt increase competition in the SAN industry. Currently, Brocade is the top contender in this market, and Brocade's main competition comes from Cisco Systems and McData. While Brocade has the most market share in both the SAN switching and Fabric switch markets, it is # to McData in Director market share. Cisco Systems has a relatively low market share in all three markets mentioned, but it is also new to the industry and is expected to become a very strong contender. Other competitors listed in Brocade's 10-K include Inrange and QLogic corporations, each with much smaller market shares.

Brocade began operations on August 4, 15 in San Jose, CA; but was not incorporated until May 14, 1 as a Delaware corporation. Reasoning for incorporating in a different state than operations included more business friendly laws in Delaware. The company's CEO and chairman is Greg Reyes who has served this position since May 001. Brocade's Vice President, Finance and CFO is Tony Canova, who has also had this position since May 001. Included in Brocade's BOD is Chris Paisley, who kicks ass. The independent auditor for Brocade, as of 00, is the international company, KPMG LLP. This is a change from Brocade's past independent public accountant, Arthur Andersen LLP, which has ceased operations. Both Arthur Andersen LLP and KPMG LLP gave Brocade reports that express the opinion that Brocade's financial statements were presented fairly and were made in accordance with GAAP.

On November 5, 00, Brocade announced an agreement to acquire Rhapsody, a privately held technology company that provides an intelligent fabric application platform. Brocade's investment strategy is to make minority investments in companies that develop complementary goods and services or broaden the market. Other significant changes to the company include a recent announcement of a restructuring program in efforts to maintain profitability. This program includes an approximate 1 percent reduction of Brocade's current workforce, consolidation of facilities, and restructuring of business functions.

Horizontal and vertical analysis of Brocade's balance sheets from 1 to Q of 00 shows several trends in different assets and liabilities as a percent of total assets and total liabilities and shareholder's equity. First, current assets as a percentage of total assets have shrunk over time from 6% in 1 to 4% in Q of 00. There was a large decline from 6% in Brocade's first year of being incorporated to 6% in 000, and after that, the decline was more gradual. An increase in long-term assets such as Plant, Property, and Equipment; long-term investments; and other assets caused this decline. Another important percentage to decline over time is the percentage of acid test assets to total assets. This went from 1% in 1 to 46% in Q of 00, indicating that a lesser proportion of Brocade's total assets were in cash, marketable securities, and accounts receivable accounts. Like the others, the percentage of current liabilities to total liabilities and shareowner's equity also decreased over time. This percentage went from 8% in 1 to 10% in Q of 00. This means that less and less of the company was financed by short-term debt. Computing Brocade's acid test ratios from 1 to Q of 00 reveals not only that Brocade is a highly liquid company, but also that it has been gradually becoming more liquid as the years pass on. There is an exception to this; however, and that is the year 001. The acid ratio started at . in 1, went up to 4. in 000, dropped dramatically to .8 in 001, went back up to 4.1 in 00, and rose to 4.5 in Q of 00. Although the all acid ratios for Brocade were certainly high enough by lender's standards, it may be important to note that doubled current liabilities in 001 of $115 million up from $64 million in 000 caused the exceptional acid ratio in 001.

In examination of Brocade's statement of cash flows, the sources of cash generated each year can be seen. The following chart shows net cash provided by operating activities and net cash provided by financing activities as percentages of the net cash increases for each year. It is important to note that Q of 00 actually had a net cash decrease for the quarter.

Q00 00 001 000 1

operating cash/ net cash increase for each year -% 0% 1% 406% 10%

financing cash/ net cash increase for each year 7% 160% 66% 558% 45%

In 1, a much greater portion of net cash for the year was provided by financing activities. This does not necessarily have negative indications for Brocade's financial standings. The reason being is that this was Brocade's first year as a corporation, so it is logical that they would need to finance most of their cash. This changed in 000, when cash provided by operating activities nearly doubled that of cash provided by financial activities. In 001, operating activities still provided more cash than financing activities; however, this changed in 00, where financing activities provided $477.51 million more cash. This is important to note because it means that Brocade accumulated a very large debt in 00. The chart is not as clear for Q of 00 because both the cash provided by financing activities and the net cash increase for the quarter were negative values; however, cash from operations did provide $6.5 million. Because on average, Brocade gets more of its cash each year from operating activities, it is not likely that they will have problems with short-term solvency. However, the very large amount of convertible subordinated debt acquired in 00 may provide long-term solvency problems in the future.

In examining Brocade's long-term solvency, it is important to look at how its leverage ratios have changed over the years. The following is a chart displaying Brocade's debt/asset and debt/equity ratios from 1 to Q of 00. It also shows these ratios if Commitments (lease obligations) were included in the liabilities portion of the balance sheet for years 000-00

Debt/ Assets Ratio Q00

51% 00

5% 001

1% 000

14% 1

8%

Debt/ Equity Ratio 104% 107% 7% 16% %

Debt/ Assets ratio (w/ capitalized Commitments) 5% 4% 15%

Debt/ Equity Ratio (w/ capitalized Commitments) 110% 0% 17%

There are a few trends that can be seen in this chart. One is that since 00, debt has become a much larger portion of total assets. This can be attributed to the aforementioned sizable long-term debt that Brocade accrued in 00. Another change, also attributed to the large long-term debt, is that total liabilities have drastically become a greater source of assets than shareholder's equity. The jump of the debt/equity ratio between the years 001-00 went from 7% to 107%, respectively, signifies a dramatic increase in the use of borrowed funds. This could pose problems for Brocade's long-term solvency.

When lenders want to see if Brocade can make required interest payments from current earnings they will look at the times interest earned ratio. The following is the times interest earned ratio for the years 000, 00, and Q of 00. 1 and 001 have been omitted because the amount of these year's interest expenses was negligible.

Times interest earned ratio Q00

7.7571 00

.6771 000

1547.778

From these ratios, it is plain to see that Brocade easily covers its interest payments with current earnings. This means that a lender would be very confident that Brocade would be able to make interest payments owed to them, and therefore, be willing to lend money to Brocade. From a financial standpoint, Brocade seems to be a very stable business. The fact that Brocade looks so good to lenders helped them to accumulate the massive debt in 00, which would be the only source of doubt in analyzing Brocades financial security. The future of Brocade's good financial standings depends on the company's ability to pay off current portions of its long-term debt as they come due. This is dependent on Brocade's ability to generate much more cash from operations than from financing activities in the upcoming years.

Next is an examination of how management has conducted its investing activities. This examination is aided by the following table which shows the fixed asset turnover and asset turnover ratios from 1 to Q of 00.

Fixed asset turnover ratio(sales/long-term assets) Q00

1% 00

80% 001

165% 000

188% 1

186%

Asset turnover(Sales/ total assets) 10% 40% 75% 7% 5%

The trends in these two ratios are that over the years, sales are becoming a smaller portion of assets. An exception is the change of sales increasing as a portion of total assets between 1 and 001. This could be explained by the fact that Brocade was just starting as a corporation in 1, and as a result, had a relatively paltry amount of assets while also enjoying increasing amounts of sales relative to other years. The dramatic decrease in the asset turnover ratio between 001 and 00 can be explained by Brocade's more that doubling total assets while only increasing sales by $4.4 million. This doubling of total assets was caused by Brocade's purchasing of a $640.777 million long-term asset in 00. The value of this purchase will not be fully assessable until it either pays off or proves to be unnecessary in the future. The fixed asset turnover ratio also exhibits an exception in the year of 1, which can also be attributed to the fact that Brocade was new as a corporation. This extremely high ratio is because back in 1, Brocade hardly had any long-term assets to speak of, and even though sales were relatively small, they still dwarfed long-term assets. The fact that these asset turnover ratios are getting smaller over the years reflects the normal growth of a large corporation as it accumulates assets. The decreasing ratios do, however, have negative implications for Brocade. They indicate that it is taking more and more assets to generate each sale as time goes on. NEED INDUSTRY STANDARDS HERE!

Please note that this sample paper on brocade's financials is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on brocade's financials, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on brocade's financials will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Computers. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Computers paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Computers, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Computers paper at affordable prices!

There isnt hardly anybody around who can say their lives havent

been influenced by computers. Computers have all but taken over

society as we know it. Everywhere you look, computers have greatly

improved our lives. It can be as simple as going through a carwash, a

Custom Essays on Computers

computer processes the information that we feed it and adjusts the

machine accordingly to give us the particular wash we paid for.

Computers also play an extremely complicated role in one of the things

that everybody uses in their everyday lives, our cars. Most people

dont realize how much our cars have been taken over by technology,

until they get the bill after one of these computers go out. Just

about everything in a new car is controlled by a computer, a computer

will read and recognize your driving patterns and adjusts how and when

the transmission should shift from gear-to-gear so that you, as the

driver, will get maximum performance from your car. In some vehicles,

a computer will adjust how high the car rides from the ground. It

lowers the car at highway speeds to make it more aerodynamic which

will give you better gas mileage and makes the car easier to handle at

these high speeds. The latest computer technology is an on-board

navigational computer that will direct the driver into using the

fastest and most efficient way to get to the destination. It will

plan your route around any construction, traffic jams, and even

inclement weather. If and when these cars break down, a mechanic will

simply ask the cars on-board computer what is wrong, rather than

having to go through a series of complicated troubleshooting tests.

As I have clearly stated, computers have greatly improved something

that most of us use every day.

Another advantage of the computer that until recently I was

unfamiliar with is the role of the computer in the workplace. I have

worked at various jobs in my short existence on this earth. For the

most part, the most technologically advanced any of them were was

merely punching prices into a cash register, hardly a state-of-the-art

process by any means. Most of the jobs I have worked at were more

labor-oriented jobs, so I suppose that is why this is kind of a change

for me. These days I wait tables at a local bar and grill. I have

worked at restaurants like this before, but none of those places were

dependent on a computer like this one is. For example, at my old job,

when we took orders for drinks we scribbled it down on a sheet of

paper and then threw it at the bartender along with another ten people

so he could try and figure out just what the heck was written down.

This process seemed to take forever. Now all I have to do is go to

the computer, press a couple of buttons, and voila, the bartender gets

a clear printout of what needs to be made. And with any luck, the

drinks should be ready by the time I get to the bar. Needless to say

I like the method of using the computer much better than the old way

of writing everything down. This has also solved a lot of problems of

the same kind in the kitchen, also. As having the experience of being

a cook at one time, there was nothing that got on my nerves more than

trying to read the handwriting of someone who had to take an order in

a room filtering out more than 150 people making noise while trying to

jot everything down as fast as they can. As you can probably imagine,

this turns into a lose-lose situation for the people trying to work

through all of this. The cook is mad at the server for not being able

to write the order in plain English. The server is mad at the cook

for always being so critical and not worrying about themselves.

Eventually the person who is effected most by all of this is the

customer. What happens is the cook finally just doesnt care about

the order anymore and doesnt prepare a good meal, or the server gets

ticked off at the cook and ends up taking out their frustration on the

customer who doesnt get the quality of service that they deserve.

That is a whole bunch of problems that came out of just one tiny

little detail, that being not writing the order clearly enough. At my

current job, when a food order is taken, the same process is followed

by simply pushing the right series of buttons for what the customer

ordered. After this, a copy of the order is printed out in the

kitchen and is very easy to read. This makes it hard for the cook to

blame anybody else other than themselves for any problems that occur.

There never has to be any guessing games as to what the server was

trying to write down. But there are a few drawbacks to this system,

it seems that every computer is a little bit different and you cant

expect everybody in the workplace to become an expert on that

particular computer that is there. Henry David Thoreaus statement

saying men have become tools of their tools can definitely true in

this case. I have had it happen to me where I accidentally hit the

wrong button at the wrong time and the computer froze up. One time it

took me almost ten minutes to figure out what I had done wrong and fix

it. I had truly been at the mercy of technology at this time. All in

all I definitely feel that, in this case, a business is better off

using technology than going without it. On the basis of his

statement, Thoreau would probably disagree with me saying that this

technology is only the beginning. Before long there will be robots

and computers waiting the tables, cooking the food, and mixing the

drinks. He might suggest that eventually only one person will be

needed to run such a business, and that person is the one who supplies

all of the capital and buys the equipment. Then the place would just

run itself, while that person sits back and reaps the benefits. My

counter-argument would be this, so long as there are people in this

world who are interested in getting the most value for their dollar,

they would rather be at a place where they are treated like a person,

by a person. The alternative option is this, every time you want or

need a service, you will become nothing more than an invoice number.

You will talk to a computer about what ever is your current need, and

then if you are lucky, that need will be quickly satisfied. The truth

is nobody really wants to be an invoice number. So as far as society

being taken over by technology completely, I cant imagine that will

ever happen. I believe that we as a society will use technology to

every advantage possible, but it will always be used to our advantage

and it will always improve the quality of our lives.

We need to be sure that we stick with our values and make sure

that technology doesnt get out of hand. A lot of people disagree on

what exactly is too much technology. In my opinion we can always keep

adding technology to our everyday lives as long as the technology

isnt manipulated to the point that we have to take advantage of and

exploit other people in order to get ahead. I know it would be great

if everything worked out that way, but as we all know we dont live in

a perfect world and no matter what the scenario is, somebodys toes

have to get stepped on if anybody wants to rise to the top.

Another problem I can see arising is people letting technology

overcome their lives and eventually they will be overcome by laziness.

Erich Fromm was also aware of this problem when he wrote his essay

Work in an Alienated Society by stating the following It is not

difficult to recognize the widespread longing for the state of

complete laziness and passivity. Our advertising appeals to it even

more than to sex. It is amazing what kind of perspective Fromm had

on the subject considering he wrote the essay in 155. A lot of

people today are willing to spend huge sums of money on something that

will make a task easier and effortless, whether or not it will do a

quality and efficient job. As long as they dont have to use up too

much energy, the consumer is happy they got the job done, never mind

the fact it cost them hundreds of dollars to buy the equipment to get

the job done easier.

As far as computers in the workplace go, in my example of having

computers put to use in a restaurant doesnt cause the workers to

become lazy. It enables the business to operate more efficiently, and

that is something that everybody looks forward to, including the

owners, managers, employees, and most importantly the customers. The

morale of the employees where I work now is ten times greater than

that of where I worked before. Simply put, the environment that I get

to work in is fun. It may sound strange to give computers all of the

credit but I believe that having computers in this setting have

contributed to an all-around better business which has shown up in the

revenue generated by this particular business.

As much as I have praised the presence of computers in a

restaurant setting there are a few setbacks, of which are greatly

outnumbered by the positive aspects. The most prominent setback

incurred by these computers that I have seen is the training-in

process. As I said earlier everyone of these computers is different,

so even if you have had prior experience with computers in a similar

setting, you will be basically starting from scratch when it comes

time to learn a new computer. Personally I have been at my present

job for about a month and-a-half and I am still learning how to use

the computer. It seems like every day I learn something new on that

thing and, at times, I think it has a personal vendetta against me.

But on the other hand, about 5% of the time it helps me to do my job

better. It would be interesting to see how many complaints I would

have if I had to write out everybodys orders and bills. With my

handwriting, chances are I wouldnt have lasted a week in that place.

In todays society, the main issue of technology is ethics,

people are afraid that technology can be corrupting, and with good

reason. However, I think that people feel this way because they are

the generation that has to adapt to this technology. Tomorrows

generation will have a totally different attitude about the subject,

they will be accustomed to technology in the workplace because it will

have been there ever since they entered the job market. All in all,

everybody will learn to use technology in each of their professions

and it will make this world a better place to live.

Please note that this sample paper on Computers is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Computers, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Computers will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on arguments on death penalty. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality arguments on death penalty paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in arguments on death penalty, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your arguments on death penalty paper at affordable prices cheap essay writing service!

Death Penalty Argument There are four main reasons for punishment rehabilitation (to return someone to a former status), reformation (to re-form or re-create an individual), deterrence (to deter others or to deter the person punished), and retribution (an eye for an eye). The death penalty is a punishment to a person in which the person is put to death for a very serious crime they have committed, usually when they take another persons life. Our state and federal legislators have created laws that specifically identify which crimes a person commits that can be punishable by the death penalty. The death penalty is seen as a deterrent to increasing and more serious crime. If members of the society know that if they commit serious crimes they could be put to death for it, they are less likely to commit these crimes. However, there is great disagreement in our society about whether it is a true deterrent to crime or not. When I think of the thousands of inhabitants of Death Rows in the prisons in this country...my reaction is Whats taking us so long? Lets get that electrical current flowing. Drop those pebbles now! Whenever I argue this with friends who have opposite views, they say that I dont have enough regard for the most marvelous of miracles - human life. Just the opposite Its because I have so much regard for human life that I favor capital punishment. Murder is the most terrible crime there is. Anything less than the death penalty is an insult to the victim and society. It says...that we dont value the victims life enough to punish the killer fully. Many abolition supporters quote, the death penalty is not a deterrent. Many abolitionist also add there is NO deterrent for a murderer (there will always be a few individuals that are up for a challenge no matter what the consequences are for their crimes in my opinion). Since jail is neither a deterrent in essence, according to those that wish to abolish the death penalty, how long before jail time for murderers would be their next punishment to target for removal from our books. One argument states that the death penalty does not deter murder. Dismissing capital punishment on that basis requires us to eliminate all prisons as well because they do not seem to be any more effective in the deterrence of crime. Others say that states which do have the death penalty have higher crime rates than those that dont, that a more severe punishment only inspires more severe crimes. I must point out that every state in the union is different. These differences include the populations, number of cities, and yes, the crime rates. Strongly urbanized states are more likely to have higher crime rates than states that are more rural, such as those that lack capital punishment. The states that have capital punishment have it because of their high crime rate, not the other way around. Abolitionists claim that there are alternatives to the death penalty. They say that life in prison without parole serves just as well. Certainly, if you ignore all the murders criminals commit within prison when they kill prison guards and other inmates, and also when they kill decent citizens upon escape, like Dawud MuMin who was serving a 48-year sentence for the 17 murder of a cab driver when he escaped a road work gang and stabbed to death a storekeeper named Gadys Nopwasky in a 188 robbery that netted $4.00. Fortunately, there is now no chance of MuMin committing murder again. He was executed by the state of Virginia on November 14, 17. Another flaw is that life imprisonment tends to deteriorate with the passing of time. Take the Moore case in New York State for example. In 16, James Moore raped and strangled 14-year-old Pamela Moss. Her parents decided to spare Moore the death penalty on the condition that he be sentenced to life in prison without parole. Later on, thanks to a change in sentencing laws in 18, James Moore is eligible for parole every two years! If Pamelas parents knew that they couldnt trust the state, Moore could have been executed long ago and they could have put the whole horrible incident behind them forever. Instead they have a nightmare to deal with biannually. Ill bet not a day goes by that they dont kick themselves for being foolish enough to trust the liberal sham that is life imprisonment and rehabilitation. (According to the US Department of Justice, the average prison sentence served for murder is five years and eleven months.) Putting a murderer away for life just isnt good enough. Laws change, so do parole boards, and people forget the past. Those are things that cause life imprisonment to weather away. As long as the murderer lives, there is always a chance, no matter how small, that he will strike again. And there are people who run the criminal justice system who are naive enough to allow him to repeat his crime. Abolitionists claim that the death penalty is un-constitutional by quoting the eighth amendment which forbids cruel and unusual punishment. Cruel and unusual has never been defined by our founding fathers, but lets examine the issue anyway. Where does the Supreme Court stand on the cruel and unusual claim of the abolitionists? In several cases the Justices of the Supreme Court have held that the DP is not cruel and/or unusual , and is in fact, a Constitutionally acceptable remedy for a criminal act. There are those who insist that the Constitution does not support the death penalty. This is simply not true. The Fifth Amendment states "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." There is a popular saying that only God has the right to take a human life. But nowhere in the bible is this statement confirmed. Indeed, Genesis 6, God states Whoever shedeth man's blood, by man shall his blood shall be shed. Also, in the time when God was giving His law to Moses and His people, He said, He who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death. Exodus 11 Moreover you shall take no ransom for the life of a murderer who is guilty of death, but he shall surely be put to death. Numbers 51 So you shall not pollute the land where you are; for blood defiles the land, and no atonement can be made for the land, for the blood that is shed on it, except by the blood of him who shed it. Numbers 5 The whole reason why nations and governments exist is to defend their decent citizens from vicious criminals. When it fails to do that, they become of little use to its citizens. When a society ignores their moral duty to defend the safety and security of their decent citizens and leaves them at the mercy of violent criminals, they are not being civilized, they are being negligent. I am certain that there will come a time when all the nations in the world will be forced to agree after decades of experience on this issue, that capital punishment, like the military and the police force and taxes, is an inevitable and unavoidable consequence of every civilized society and it will no longer be a question of whether or not a nation should have the death penalty, but rather how it should be used. While I believe that prompt and consistent executions would have a deterrent effect, there remains one great virtue, even for infrequent executions. The recidivism rate for capital punishment is zero. No executed murderer has ever killed again. You cant say that about those sentenced to prison, even if you are an abolitionist. By giving a murderer the death penalty, we are treating him with the same respect he treated his victim. We are giving them what they deserve, exactly what they did to the victim. If someone kills and only receives 15 years in jail, this is stating that the victim's life was only worth 15 years. When in reality, the person's life was worth another person's life. Even life in jail, is still giving the murderer partial freedom, this freedom is to live. By taking his life, he is losing freedom, which is exactly what he took away from his victim. Equal treatment and justice demands a punishment that matches the crime. Capital punishment for premeditated murder provides exactly this. The death penalty is the only punishment, if any that will deter anyone from committing such the horrible crime of murder. The thing that most people fear most is death. If anything will stop the murderer from killing it is the thought that he might die himself. If he kills a victim, he kills himself. This if any will be the only hope that less murders will occur. Any other punishment is reversible, death isn't. My group feels that the killing of another human being without reason is cold and cruel, and should never go without an equal sentence. To murder someone shows that you have no conscience and are very liable to do the same thing again, if you were to get the chance. There is no way of guaranteeing that the convict will never kill again, he could be let out on bail or escape from jail. The murderer will kill and kill until he is caught again. With the death penalty time, money, and lives would've been saved. As it states in the Bible "Whosoever shedeth the man's blood by man shall his blood be shed." The Old Testament, Genesis 6 This states that if a man kills, by man he shall die. The Bible also states "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, hand for a hand, foot for a foot." The Old Testament, Numbers 14 This states that whatever was done to the victim shall be done to the culprit. I believe murderers should be put to death because the person's life who they have taken away has also affected and destroyed the lives of the person's family and friends. These people will be put at ease knowing that justice was served to the murderer and that he is now dead. These are just a few of the reasons that lead me to believe that the death penalty is not only a suitable sentence for a convicted murderer but a must! It all comes down to one thing if someone kills an innocent person, the same act he has done deserves to be done to him.

Please note that this sample paper on arguments on death penalty is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on arguments on death penalty, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on arguments on death penalty will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment cheap essay writing service and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

If you order your essay from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Andrew Jackson. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Andrew Jackson paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Andrew Jackson, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Andrew Jackson paper at affordable prices!

Like any hall of fame, its inductees are the best in whatever

they do, from baseball or football to something like being President.

If you are a member of any hall of fame (including the one for the

Presidents), it means that you have done something special or have a

Buy custom Andrew Jackson term paper

certain quality about yourself that makes you worthy to be in a hall

of fame. My nominee for the Presidents hall of Fame is our seventh

President of the United States, Andrew Jackson. Ill go over his

presidency, focusing on both the highs and the lows of his two terms

in office, from 18-187. The issues that Ill focus on are states

rights, nullification, the tariff, the spoils system, Indian removal

and banking policies; these controversies brought forth strong rivalry

over his years of president. He was known for his iron will and fiery

personality, and strong use of the powers of his office that made his

years of presidency to be known as the Age of Jackson.

Andrew Jackson was born on March 15, 1767, in a settlement on

the border of North and South Carolina. He was orphaned at age 14.

After studying law and becoming a member of the Bar in North Carolina

later he moved to Nashville Tennessee. Their he became a member of a

powerful political faction led by William Blount. He was married in

171 to Rachel Donelson Robards, and later remarried to him due to a

legal mistake in her prior divorce in 174.

Jackson served as delegate to Tenn. in the 176 Constitutional

convention and a congressman for a year (from 176-7). He was elected

senator in 177, but financial problems forced him to resign and

return to Tennessee in less than a year. Later he served as a

Tennessee superior court judge for six years starting in 178. In 1804

he retired from the bench and moved to Nashville and devoted time to

business ventures and his plantation. At this time his political

career looked over.

In 1814 Jackson was a Major General in the Tennessee Militia,

here he was ordered to march against the Creek Indians (who were

pro-British in the war of 181). His goal was achieved at Horseshoe

Bend in March of 1814. Eventually he forced All Indians from the area.

His victorys impressed some people in Washington and Jackson was put

in command of the defense of New Orleans. This show of American

strength made Americans feel proud after a war filled with military

defeats. Jackson was given the nickname Old Hickory, and was treated

as a national hero.

In 1817 he was ordered against the Seminole Indians. He pushed

them back into Spanish Florida and executed two British subjects.

Jackson instead that his actions were with approval of the Monroe

administration. His actions helped to acquire the Florida territory,

and he became a provisional governor of Florida that same year.

In 18 the Tennessee Legislature nominated him for president

and the following year he was elected the U.S. senate. He also nearly

won the presidential campaign of 184 however as a result of the

corrupt bargain with Henry Clay. Over the next four years the

current administration built a strong political machine with

nationalistic policies and a lack of concern of states rights. In 188

through a campaign filled with mud slinging on both sides, Andrew

Jackson became the seventh President to the United States.

Instead of the normal cabinet made up by the president, he

relied more on an informal group of newspaper writers and northern

politicians who had worked for his election. I believe that this made

him more in contact with the people of the United States, more in

contact with the public opinion and feelings toward national issues

President Jackson developed the system of rotation in office. This

was used to protect the American people from a development of a

long-standing political group by removing long-term office holders.

His enemies accused him of corruption of civil service for political

reasons. However, I think that it was used to insure loyalty of the

people in his administration. States rights played an important part

in Jacksons policys as president. In the case of the Cherokee

Indians vs. The State of Georgia, two Supreme Court decisions in 181

and 18 upholding the rights of the Cherokee nation over the State of

Georgia who had wanted to destroy Cherokee jurisdiction on its land

because gold had been found on it, and the state seeing the Indians as

tenants on state land decided to kick them out. Chief Justice John

Marshall ruled that Georgia had no jurisdiction to interfere with the

rights of the Cherokee and removal of them would violate treaties

between them and the U.S. Government. However, Jackson, not liking

these decisions was reported of saying John Marshall has made his

decision, now let him enforce it. It seems to me like a slap in

Justice Marshalls face, that Jackson was and always will be an Indian

fighter. I think he just liked pushing around the Indians because he

new that whatever resistance they had was no match for the U.S. army.

To emphasize his point, in 188 (one year after Jackson left office),

a unite of federal troops rounded up the 15,000 Cherokee who resisted

relocation and remained in Georgia and during the cold and rain of

winter forced them to march to their lands in the west, this was known

as the Trail of Tears since about 5% of the people died in route of

either disease, starvation, and exposure to the cold. Even though

Jackson wasnt in office at the time and is not a part of his

presidency, his effluence still existed through his predecessor,

Martin Van Burin.

The question of the tariff was a major controversy in the

United States around the years of his Presidency and his strong

support for a unified nation oven states rights would hold the country

together in this national crisis. Jackson had promised the south a

reduction in duties to levels established in 188, which were

acceptable to southerners as opposed to the higher rates since then.

In 18 his administration only sliced away a little bit of the

duties, not close to what the south expected he would do. In

retaliation of this insulting lack of concern of the Souths voice in

government, South Carolina acting on the doctrine of Nullification

which stated that the union was made up of the states and that the

states had the right to null or void a law if they didnt agree with

it, declared the federal tariff laws of 188 and 18 invalid and

prohibited collection of tariffs after February first of 18.

Jacksons response to this came on his Nullification Proclamation on

December 10, 18. He declared his intent to enforce the law and was

willing to seek and agreement in a lowering of tariffs. In 18

congress passed a compromise bill which set a new tariff, when the

other southern states accepted the new tariff the threat of S.

Carolina breaking away form the union was brought to a happy end.

The Second Bank of the United States was not made into an

issue of his election in 188 by Jackson. However he decided the bank,

which is not a government bank, but chartered by it in 186, had

failed to provide a stable currency, and had favored the Northern

states, and few loans were granted to the southern and western areas

because they were a larger risk and the bank didnt see it in its

interest to make such a gamble with its money. And in his mind the

bank was in violation on the Constitution. Even though the banks

charter wasnt due to expire until 186, Jacksons political enemies

pushed a bill through congress granting the banks re-charter, Jackson

vetoed the bill. The Bank issue was a major item in his re-election

in 18. In his second term Jackson decided to remove federal deposits

from the bank into pet banks which virtually took away the power

Nicholas Biddles power as president of the Second National Bank,

which left him and anti-Jackson people very upset with what they

called the abuse of his powers. The increase in loans from the state

chartered caused a land boom and gave the federal government a surplus

(which it split up amongst the states), the increase in loans brought

on the use of paper currency that was issued by the state banks,

Jackson prohibited the use of paper money to by federal land or pay

federal debts. This demand for coins called specie led to many bank

failures in the Panic of 187. I dont think he knew what he got

himself into when he did this, and could of handled the situation a

little better, but not all the blame should fall on his shoulders,

because it wasnt his fault the private state-chartered banks issued

the paper money when they didnt have the specie to back it up.

Jacksons foreign policy showed a strong interest in making

the French to pay long-overdue spoliation claims and reopening the

British West Indian Trade. Even thought he personally agreed with the

rebellion of Texas against Mexico. He didnt recognize the Lone Star

republic until the day before he left office in 187, and left the

problem of Texas annexation to Martin Van Buren. Even though Jackson

switched support form his successor Martin Van Buren to James K. Polk

(probably due to Van Burins failed economic policy). Jackson was a

powerful voice in the Democratic party even after retired. He died on

June 8, 1845 on his plantation, the Hermitage, in Nashville Tennessee.

Andrew Jackson was the first peoples president. This comes

from hisyouth in a frontier territory and his people qualities

which helped him to be more touch with the people of the United

States, and therefore the people of the United States took a more

active role in the Government. He even went so far as to call himself

the elected representative of all American people. I think that

Jacksons strengthening of the powers of the presidency are the

biggest influence to this day. He used the power of the veto 1 times

(more times than all of his successors combined). And his use of the

powers of removal and of executive orders made a standard for a modern

American Presidency. I only wish that their was a candidate like that

running for election in 6. The closest to someone like Jackson would

of probably been Colin Powel, unfortunately he decided not to run.

When you gave this project, I though Jackson was a mean tempered

Indian fighter who found his way to office because he took over

Florida and defended New Orleans Successfully. But I grew to learn

that he was really a great president and did a lot for the presidency

of the United States of America.

Please note that this sample paper on Andrew Jackson is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Andrew Jackson, we are here to assist you. Your persuasive essay on Andrew Jackson will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on organizational behavior. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality organizational behavior paper right on time.

Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in organizational behavior, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your organizational behavior paper at affordable prices!

Organizational culture can be defined as a system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members. It includes routine behaviors, norms, dominant values, and a feeling or climate conveyed. The purpose and function of this culture is to help foster internal integration, bring staff members from all levels of the organization much closer together, and enhance their performance.

However, there seems to be a widely held misconception that throughout an organization or within a specific division there is only one uniform culture that exists. This definition does not seem adequate because it fails to recognize that in many organizations there are quite often groups that are unique of the dominant culture. They may have values that are not consistent, or outwardly reject the culture as a whole, yet at the same time they are still able to maintain their position within the firm. In addition, it has been a personal experience that in many organizations strong organizational culture can in fact be negative, and in fact actually damage the performance of their employees. The perception is due to the fact that in many organizations the culture can act as a barrier to the employee to gain status within the organization.

This perception may have also had a lot to due with the nature of the position that was held at the company. This company seemed to fit the criteria and meet the description of a "Fortress Culture? This may have been the result of the fact that it business was in the highly competitive field of financial services. The management was very preoccupied with figures such as sales, growth and earnings, and they treated the staff as a commodity that could easily be replaced. As a contract employee there was little in the way of job security and essential no possibility to be rewarded for good performance. The theory is inadequate because it does not recognize the fact that in many businesses today, firms no longer retain all of their staff on a full-time basis. It simply assumes that many of the individuals are full time staff members and at least have short-term job certainty. It fails to recognize the fact that by having many individuals that are working in organizations as part time or contract staff is not really given the opportunity, or they do not wish to become part of the organizational culture. Hence they elect not to internalize the company's culture and in turn establish their own distinct sub-culture of individuals that share their own beliefs.

Many of the fail points within the organization could be traced directly back to its socialization process. The socialization process is the process by which an organization brings new employees into its culture. The older members of the society transmit to younger members the social skills and knowledge needed to function effectively in the organization. This process of the organization develops the skills and competencies needed to perform the new job. Although the company seemed to be successful in the first two steps the remainder of the process seemed to be inconsistent with this theory.

The company followed the traditional pattern of selecting potential candidates through the use of trained recruiters and a standardized procedure. These recruiters looked for a variety of specific traits in each candidate that they believed would make them suitable for the position at the firm. Those individuals that did not meet these strict criteria were not considered for the position. The organization also had many similarities with the next step in which the successful candidates were placed in many challenging environments, or impossible situations to test their commitment to the position. The theory then suggests that at this point in the process those individuals who are not willing to accept the culture would be removed and all others allowed to proceed. Yet this does not seem to be adequate for two reasons. To begin with the theory does not account for the fact that in reality many individuals to not actual accept the norms and values but they simply give off the appearance that they do in an attempt to retain their position. Quite often individuals never really become part of the dominant culture yet merely they try to give that impression so that they are not dismissed. Secondly, it falls short in the case of many individuals that have been hired as a contract employee. Not having the certainty and job security of a full time staff member makes individuals less open towards the organization's norms and values. By not having the confidence in their future at the firm individuals are likely to be very reluctant to make the effort and try to become part of the team, and eventually the firm's culture.

In addition the candidates did not receive the extensive training that was needed to help develop their skills and perform the routine tasks of this very demanding position. This may have been a result of the fact that the company was unsure whether they would retain the services of the new staff. This in turn made many of the new recruits feel inadequate when compared to their full-time counterparts. Hence they did not feel part of the team and part of the organization. It also had the unintentional effect of reinforcing the feeling among many individuals that the company was not committed to them and that they did not want to make the investment in their training since they were uncertain whether they would keeping them as members of the organization.

There was also the feeling among the staff members that if the company was not committed to them for a specific length of time what importance is there for them to make the effort and try to belong to the company's culture. The socialization theory simply concluded that the staff and the firm would work together in promoting these shared beliefs and the only recourse of this system did not work was to dismiss those individuals that deviated from the norm. It did not recognize that there could be failings within the process that may have required change on the part of the organization.

What may have also been a contributing factor to the failure of the socialization process, and an element that is not discussed in the theory, is how the socialization process works when the field of business is of a very competitive nature. In this case is does not seem that many of the older staff members would be willing to accept the new staff and help them develop their skills. This is due to the fact that if the new members performed the skills of the position better and more efficiently than the older staff it would have the effect of undermining the older staff members job security. It seemed more common that the existing staff would erect barriers for the new staff. They would do this in an attempt to secure the permanence of their position.

In this case if the organization wanted to maintain competition between its staff members what may have been a more appropriate action would be for their socialization process to be much more rapid. This is because it would have had the likely effect of reducing much of the uncertainty, and surrounding the new position. This is especially important for those individuals that were on a contract basis since they believed ahead of time that they were only going to remain at the position for a very short time, and thus there was no reason for them to be very productive.

Much of the uncertainty surrounding the position was also a reflection of the managerial style of the department head. He believe that the organization could maintain its identity and culture by constantly removing employees who deviated from his narrow and rigid opinion of accepted behavior and job performance. He believed that uncertainty in the organizations would make individuals within the workplace be more productive and remain in line with the firm's notion of accepted norms and behaviors. The manager achieved this by regularly relying on firings, fear, and quilt to build the organization. In fact, this attitude had the exact opposite outcome. In prolonging the socialization period and by constantly making the individual feel inadequate the individual never really felt part of the culture. As a result these individuals quite often did not make the effort of buying into the values and norms of the company. This resulted in job dissatisfaction, low work motivation, tension, high turnover, rejection of values (which in many cases resulted in other subcultures), and an overall lack of commitment to the firm.

The company would have been much more successful if the manager were to try and promote the culture in a more positive way. This could be achieved by trying to establish a sense of pride and enthusiasm in the firm rather that requiring each individual to strictly adhere to a narrow and rigid behavior. In doing so the firm would more likely have a much more devote staff since they feel more comfortable about their position in the firm and the future. The staff would be encouraged by the fact that they feel part of the team and hence they would be more proactive, productive and add value to the company.

The theory seems to adequately explain how the organization failed to achieve their goal through the example of sharedness and intensity. Sharedness refers to the degree to which the organizational members have the same core values. The intensity is the level of commitment that the members of the organization make to the core values. Two major factors, orientation and rewards affect the degree of sharedness. In order for people to share the same cultural values they must know what these values are. This can be directly linked to their orientation and training programs. However, it is also significantly affected by rewards. When organizations offer promotions, raises, recognition, to those who adhere to the core values, it helps other individuals within the organization understand what the values are.

The degree of intensity can also be connected to the reward structure. When individuals realize that they will be rewarded for doing things the "Corporate Way?their desire to do so increases dramatically. Therefore, as the theory suggests if individuals, like contract staff or part-timers, did not feel part of the reward structure, because they did not receive the perks of the position or equal pay. In addition, these members of the organization did not also receive any non-financial rewards either.

This paper is the property of freeforessays.com Copyright ?00-00

Please note that this sample paper on organizational behavior is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on organizational behavior, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on organizational behavior will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!